The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Research and interpret the e-learning resource requirements
|
|
The brief, focus and type of e-learning resource is clarified with the client Completed |
Evidence:
|
The likely target audience/s and the e-learning environment is researched Completed |
Evidence:
|
The characteristics of the learners/end users are identified and their suitability for e-learning is evaluated Completed |
Evidence:
|
Existing information which may be relevant is investigated and analysed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Training Package and/or other relevant criteria are read, interpreted and analysed to determine suitability for e-learning delivery and assessment solutions and the outcomes of this analysis is clarified with the client Completed |
Evidence:
|
Ethical and legal considerations are identified and acted upon Completed |
Evidence:
|
Generate options for e-learning resource
|
|
Standards and guidelines relevant to the design and development of e-learning resources are identified and clarified Completed |
Evidence:
|
Competency standards or other relevant criteria are interpreted to generate and conceptualise design ideas in conjunction with other people Completed |
Evidence:
|
Principles of instructional design, other design techniques and learning theory are applied in proposing and selecting suitable ideas for the e-learning resource Completed |
Evidence:
|
Possible constraints are identified and considered in developing design options Completed |
Evidence:
|
Materials for the trainer/facilitator are identified and documented Completed |
Evidence:
|
A preferred design concept is selected and justified as meeting the client requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Create the design concept
|
|
Critical feedback is sought from relevant persons and is interpreted to modify and improve the design concept, as required Completed |
Evidence:
|
Collaborative arrangements to finalise the design concept are established, where appropriate Completed |
Evidence:
|
Sample content is developed which reflects the demonstrated application of e-learning instructional design principles and contains appropriate e-learning activities Completed |
Evidence:
|
The design demonstrates flexibility of application with contingency pathways integrated and described in the concept Completed |
Evidence:
|
Learner, trainer/facilitator support mechanisms are built into the design Completed |
Evidence:
|
A representation of the e-learning resource is created Completed |
Evidence:
|
Finalise the e-learning design concept
|
|
The design concept is reviewed in conjunction with relevant persons Completed |
Evidence:
|
The review process addresses relevant criteria to ensure relevance to the product and learner needs Completed |
Evidence:
|
The design concept is adjusted where required and finalised Completed |
Evidence:
|
The design concept is approved by the client Completed |
Evidence:
|